View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
becky sharp

Joined: 01 Dec 2008 Posts: 6791
|
Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 12:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
littlepieces wrote: | Well it looks like i will now be able to give a first hand account of life on the dole as i have been laid off.Benefit city here i come  | Hope you soon find alternative employment,littlepieces..... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Helen May

Joined: 10 Dec 2006 Posts: 19299 Location: Cheshire
|
Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 12:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The guy was 83 though well past working age, so I couldn't see the relevance.
H _________________ 88 - 91 FM this is Radio 2 from the BBC!
I said it live on air in the studio with Jeremy Vine on 10/3/2005 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ruddlescat
Joined: 16 Sep 2010 Posts: 18010 Location: Near Chester
|
Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 12:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Helen I think some clever producer probably thought well if we can find an elderly pensioner with two major disabilities who can pass the test it will show listeners
a how ridiculous and inadequate the test is and
b how slim the chance will be of any actual younger existing claimant failing it
It did seem rather silly to me and I certainly couldn't see it happening on Radio 4 _________________ Are you ready for a Ruddles? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Helen May

Joined: 10 Dec 2006 Posts: 19299 Location: Cheshire
|
Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 12:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The pensioner himself had to mention the disabilities at the end. Having said that I know someone with one eye who could work (and drive) and many people have hearing difficulties. I think they were the only disabilities that were mentioned?
Forgive me if I'm wrong as I've never claimed anything in my life, but I would have through when you reach pension age you get your pension instead of an unable to work disability?
I did email the show to say I was a bit baffled by their choice of 'victim' to be subjected to the questions.
H _________________ 88 - 91 FM this is Radio 2 from the BBC!
I said it live on air in the studio with Jeremy Vine on 10/3/2005 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ruddlescat
Joined: 16 Sep 2010 Posts: 18010 Location: Near Chester
|
Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 1:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Helen when people reach retirement age they will receive the state pension which is intended to replace other benefits but having said that I remember when I was dealing with these cases I did come across some pensioners who also received an element of Income Support on top of their pension and I think I am right in saying that any pensioner who is in receipt of Disability Living Allowance gets switched over to Attendance Allowance at the point of reaching retirement age
This is very unpopular with many of them because under DLA people can forego part of their benefit in exchange for a Motability car whereas once they retire this privilege is no longer available
The whole system is frighteningly complicated and changes so often by now I may be a bit out of touch but that's the bare bones of it
As for people who lose eyes yes they are allowed to drive
My neighbour is in that position and has to undergo a special eyesight test with the DSA every 3 years which includes a field vision test but apart from that there are no other restrictions _________________ Are you ready for a Ruddles? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Helen May

Joined: 10 Dec 2006 Posts: 19299 Location: Cheshire
|
Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 1:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I know that pensioners get income support to if their pension falls below the 'amount needed to live on' (sorry can't think of the correct name but I'm sure you know what I'm getting at).
I can't imagine an 83 year old wanting to work can you?
H _________________ 88 - 91 FM this is Radio 2 from the BBC!
I said it live on air in the studio with Jeremy Vine on 10/3/2005 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ColinB Guest
|
Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 1:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Helen May wrote: | I can't imagine an 83 year old wanting to work can you? |
My dad is 83 and does a lot of volunteer work. If he were be paid for some of it he'd be more than happy. Would he therefore be working?
I guess it depends on what we call "work"? I sit and tap away at one of three computers in exchange for a meagre crust. That's work isn't it? I'm not sure what the definition of "work" is in this post-industrial age, so when people say they can't work as a result of a disability I do wonder what "work" they're saying they can't do because a friend of my dad's is blind and physically frail, yet he manages to undertake paid work (he vets public-sector web pages for accessibility to people with disabilities).
Are they thinking of "work" as being hard labour or something? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Helen May

Joined: 10 Dec 2006 Posts: 19299 Location: Cheshire
|
Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 1:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I get your point Colin, my Dad is the same age, but what I was getting at was that an 83 year old would have been pensioned off from his or her job so they would not be able to claim incapacity benefit in the first place.
That's why I could not fathom out why the JV show was using a pensioner as an example, able as the chap was.
H _________________ 88 - 91 FM this is Radio 2 from the BBC!
I said it live on air in the studio with Jeremy Vine on 10/3/2005 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ColinB Guest
|
Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 1:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Helen May wrote: | That's why I could not fathom out why the JV show was using a pensioner as an example, able as the chap was. |
I see what you mean. I didn't hear the show but it does reflect a clear shift towards the more "tabloid" standard of radio journalism on the JV show these days, I feel. It's the main reason why I no longer go out of my way to listen to it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
littlepieces

Joined: 10 Jan 2010 Posts: 1098 Location: Lowestoft
|
Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 1:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
becky sharp wrote: | littlepieces wrote: | Well it looks like i will now be able to give a first hand account of life on the dole as i have been laid off.Benefit city here i come  | Hope you soon find alternative employment,littlepieces..... |
Thanks Becky  _________________ I found out how you can hurt an insect.It's the bees knees |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Rachel Guest
|
Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 1:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
littlepieces wrote: | Well it looks like i will now be able to give a first hand account of life on the dole as i have been laid off.Benefit city here i come  |
Oh poor old you What job did/do you do? Don't get too down about it though- I don't think you get any benefits for months. Sometimes losing a job can be the making of you. Follow my great grandma's advice- do what you're good at. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ruddlescat
Joined: 16 Sep 2010 Posts: 18010 Location: Near Chester
|
Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 2:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just to clarify Helen an 83 year old would not be entitled to claim Disability Living Allowance as this stops at retirement age but he might be able to claim Attendance Allowance which is in effect the pensioner equivalent
He would have to satisfy a threshold that he needed a certain level and frequency of care but if he was already receiving DLA at the date of retirement it is very likely that he would be transferred over without the need for further medical evidence
Once on Attendance Allowance few people come off it although they do have to undergo occasional checks but obviously as they get older generally their health deteriorates rather than improves so it gets very hard to remove the benefit _________________ Are you ready for a Ruddles? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Helen May

Joined: 10 Dec 2006 Posts: 19299 Location: Cheshire
|
Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 2:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks Ruddles!
He sounded well able to take care of himself, I was surprised when he gave his age!
H
PS Sorry to hear your news littlepieces. I hope you find something else soon. _________________ 88 - 91 FM this is Radio 2 from the BBC!
I said it live on air in the studio with Jeremy Vine on 10/3/2005 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ColinB Guest
|
Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 2:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Rachel wrote: | Follow my great grandma's advice- do what you're good at. |
How right she is!
My hobby is the means by which I earn my living - and I couldn't imagine it any other way.
Littlepieces - sorry to hear of your new-found status as one of Cameron's statistics ("We're all in this together" - yeah right) but having been down that road myself as a result of being a "Thatcher statistic" all I can say is perceive it as an opportunity rather than a setback. In order, seek to do your own thing and stuff the lot of 'em!!!  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
littlepieces

Joined: 10 Jan 2010 Posts: 1098 Location: Lowestoft
|
Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 5:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for your kind words everybody. _________________ I found out how you can hurt an insect.It's the bees knees |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mark occomore
Joined: 07 Dec 2006 Posts: 9955 Location: UK
|
Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 6:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
He's an 83 year old pensioner. He's not claming Incapacity Benefit, so true what was the point. They should have got someone who had a disability to take the test. At the end of the day, your GP is the one who knows what the problem is. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ruddlescat
Joined: 16 Sep 2010 Posts: 18010 Location: Near Chester
|
Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 6:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You hit the nail on the head there Mark when you said it is the GP who knows the true position best
The problem is that as I understand it the Government is not planning to consult the claimant's GP at all when they begin reassessing these cases which is bound to result in genuine people losing benefits or having to go through a stressful appeals procedure
I've been a Conservative voter all my life and I can tell you that even Margaret Thatcher stopped short of what is going on now - very wisely in my view
This exercise has very little to do with anything other than saving money
There are numerous other ways where savings could be made and only today a report said that the Government is spending millions of pounds paying rents on unused buildings and not fully using its buying power to secure the best deals
They should first look at these areas before attacking the most vulnerable members of society otherwise after the next election they will be out of power for a generation _________________ Are you ready for a Ruddles? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Helen May

Joined: 10 Dec 2006 Posts: 19299 Location: Cheshire
|
Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 6:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't think you would have needed a GP to answer the questions that they asked today though. How many times have GPs given sick notes when they haven't been needed?
H _________________ 88 - 91 FM this is Radio 2 from the BBC!
I said it live on air in the studio with Jeremy Vine on 10/3/2005 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ruddlescat
Joined: 16 Sep 2010 Posts: 18010 Location: Near Chester
|
Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 6:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Helen that's a very fair point
The problem is from a legal point of view GP's are considered experts whilst the rest of us including ordinary Benefits Agency staff are not
Of course if GPs are not going to be consulted in the forthcoming review then they will never be put in the position where they have to independently justify their previous actions so there will be no incentive for them to stop behaving in the same way
This whole subject is fraught with problems and it really needs gradual and thought out reform rather than knee jerk and rushed action which is what we seem to be getting
After all we all recall how the Dangerous Dogs Act was rushed through in the 1990's and the numerous anomolies and loopholes it created
In my experience panic or hurried action is not generally a good thing in the long term in these areas _________________ Are you ready for a Ruddles? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ColinB Guest
|
Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 8:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ruddlescat wrote: | I've been a Conservative voter all my life and I can tell you that even Margaret Thatcher stopped short of what is going on now - very wisely in my view |
Largely because the trade unions were still capable of defining the limits so she didn't dare try and do what these prats are trying to get away with now. They want to dismantle the welfare state and this is the best chance they'll ever get.
Still, there's hope yet. We may yet see the tipping point - a sort of modern-day "poll tax" revolt. Let's hope so. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ruddlescat
Joined: 16 Sep 2010 Posts: 18010 Location: Near Chester
|
Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 8:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes Colin I actually agree with you
Whatever people thought of Margaret Thatcher you could never accuse her of being stupid
The present lot are heading for disaster unless they modify their hastily produced policies very quickly
I was told by an insider in the Conservative Party that whoever won the recent election might be in power for 5 years but would then be out of power for 30 years as they would have to take such unpopular actions to reign in the deficit
In a way I wish Labour had won but as I may have said in earlier posts had David Davies been in charge I think we would have seen a very different approach as he was brought up in a working class family living in a council house and he is in touch with real people
The Tory Party chose the wrong leader! _________________ Are you ready for a Ruddles? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mark occomore
Joined: 07 Dec 2006 Posts: 9955 Location: UK
|
Posted: Thu Nov 11, 2010 6:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So the ones which don't try to get a job after three attempts could lose their job seekers allowance. They will be able to claim a hard ship benefit for £40. This still dosn't resolve the issue. These people will be able to continue to get housing benefit etc.
I think also asking someone to litter pick isn't really given the person an ascentive to find a job. They need to have a job which they will enjoy, not a stepping stone to the next job. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Clive55
Joined: 08 Dec 2006 Posts: 1336
|
Posted: Fri Nov 12, 2010 11:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
ruddlescat wrote: | Helen that's a very fair point
The problem is from a legal point of view GP's are considered experts whilst the rest of us including ordinary Benefits Agency staff are not
Of course if GPs are not going to be consulted in the forthcoming review then they will never be put in the position where they have to independently justify their previous actions so there will be no incentive for them to stop behaving in the same way
This whole subject is fraught with problems and it really needs gradual and thought out reform rather than knee jerk and rushed action which is what we seem to be getting
After all we all recall how the Dangerous Dogs Act was rushed through in the 1990's and the numerous anomolies and loopholes it created
In my experience panic or hurried action is not generally a good thing in the long term in these areas |
The Panels who decide these things are pretty useless. In my last job there were some claimnents who lost their ESA because the poanels decided they were fit to work when they were not. I appealed & they got their ESA re instated.
There was another client i was sure WAS fully able to work- but the panel never questioned his elegibility to ESA. Even his Psychiatrist doubted that he hads genuine mental health issues
It shows how clueless these panels are
Sadly the GP or Psychiatrists do not have a say in these tin pot panels.
This process had already begun under Labour but will no doubt get alot worse now.
As to this lot & Thatcher- I much prefer Thatcher. She was an inteligent polotician tho I disagreed with much of her polotics
The dumbos in charge now are a bad joke |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
undiscovered

Joined: 15 Sep 2010 Posts: 650 Location: Peterborough
|
Posted: Fri Nov 12, 2010 12:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well now it's three strikes and your out.
I think there seems to be cross party support for this as long as the detail is correct.
I am just waiting for the news of poeple being offered unrealistic jobs in other parts of the country for not very much so when refused on reasonable grounds is taken against them.
The main problem I have is the lack of work out there. This scheme will only work if jobs are out there. _________________ You will hear gospel and rhythm and blues and jazz, all those are just labels, we know that music is music. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mark occomore
Joined: 07 Dec 2006 Posts: 9955 Location: UK
|
Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2011 8:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
The Government are considering to cut DLA. The Cuts to Disability Living Allowance could breach human rights. The Government are considering to change it with a new personal independance allownace. This would mean more assessment tests for claiments.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-12141725 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
undiscovered

Joined: 15 Sep 2010 Posts: 650 Location: Peterborough
|
Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2011 10:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
well Stephen Hawkins has a job so why can't the rest of them
He'll look pretty foolish if he gets slapped by human rights laws. They are going for the wrong poeple in this case, they should be closing loopholes in the tax system and getting the £15bn they should be getting though hmrc. Link but that is not going to happen so taking off those that need have risen to the top of the list of targets _________________ You will hear gospel and rhythm and blues and jazz, all those are just labels, we know that music is music. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|