R2OK! Forum Index R2OK!
Contact R2OK! admin

Click here for R2OK! Website


 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Prince Harry

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    R2OK! Forum Index -> News and Current Affairs
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
mark occomore



Joined: 07 Dec 2006
Posts: 9955
Location: UK

PostPosted: Wed Aug 22, 2012 6:58 pm    Post subject: Prince Harry Reply with quote

One is an embarrassment. We going to put this on the throne

http://www.tmz.com/2012/08/21/prince-harry-naked-photos-nude-vegas-hotel-party/


Last edited by mark occomore on Wed Aug 22, 2012 7:40 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ruddlescat



Joined: 16 Sep 2010
Posts: 18010
Location: Near Chester

PostPosted: Wed Aug 22, 2012 7:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

On the 'thrown' what Mark Confused
_________________
Are you ready for a Ruddles?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ColinB
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Aug 22, 2012 9:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You can see that Mark has sneakily covered his tracks by editing his mistake with the result that your post now doesn't make sense, Ruddles!
Back to top
John W



Joined: 07 Dec 2006
Posts: 3360
Location: Warwickshire, UK

PostPosted: Wed Aug 22, 2012 9:34 pm    Post subject: Re: Prince Harry Reply with quote

mark occomore wrote:
Harry........ We going to put this on the throne



Mark,

Are you suggesting there is some plot against William's succession after Charles? Rolling Eyes Shocked
_________________
-
John W
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
ruddlescat



Joined: 16 Sep 2010
Posts: 18010
Location: Near Chester

PostPosted: Wed Aug 22, 2012 9:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ColinB wrote:
You can see that Mark has sneakily covered his tracks by editing his mistake with the result that your post now doesn't make sense, Ruddles!


I know Colin but I think by now most people can work it out Smile
_________________
Are you ready for a Ruddles?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Shaky Fan



Joined: 11 Dec 2006
Posts: 628

PostPosted: Wed Aug 22, 2012 9:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You could always outwit him by quoting him. Then even if he edits the original it is still possible to se what was changed! Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ruddlescat



Joined: 16 Sep 2010
Posts: 18010
Location: Near Chester

PostPosted: Wed Aug 22, 2012 9:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes you're quite right Shaky - I was just being rather lazy Embarassed
_________________
Are you ready for a Ruddles?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ColinB
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Aug 22, 2012 11:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ruddlescat wrote:
ColinB wrote:
You can see that Mark has sneakily covered his tracks by editing his mistake with the result that your post now doesn't make sense, Ruddles!


I know Colin but I think by now most people can work it out Smile


I know. I posted that just to let Mark know that we've sussed him again! Smile
Back to top
littlepieces



Joined: 10 Jan 2010
Posts: 1098
Location: Lowestoft

PostPosted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 4:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Perhaps i'm in a bad mood but isn't this a bit Petty? Mark and Colin seem to be having a lovers spat every 5 mins.In this case Harry is on holiday he is not representing the country so bloody what? The only bad thing i will say is Harry was a doughnut for the Nazi uniform
_________________
I found out how you can hurt an insect.It's the bees knees
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mark occomore



Joined: 07 Dec 2006
Posts: 9955
Location: UK

PostPosted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 4:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

littlepieces wrote:
Perhaps i'm in a bad mood but isn't this a bit Petty? Mark and Colin seem to be having a lovers spat every 5 mins.In this case Harry is on holiday he is not representing the country so bloody what? The only bad thing i will say is Harry was a doughnut for the Nazi uniform


I try and ignore, it might go away.

Obviously the girl had an option to snap these pictures for 10k. What stays in Vegas... should say in Vegas. He should know better and a total embarrassment to the country and Royal family. It's a great shame after being at the Olympics.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Toggy



Joined: 18 Aug 2008
Posts: 1239

PostPosted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 6:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

littlepieces wrote:
Perhaps i'm in a bad mood but isn't this a bit Petty? Mark and Colin seem to be having a lovers spat every 5 mins.In this case Harry is on holiday he is not representing the country so bloody what? The only bad thing i will say is Harry was a doughnut for the Nazi uniform


I agree, it is very petty.

As for Harry I agree again, I honestly don't see what the problem is.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
R2Icon



Joined: 10 Sep 2009
Posts: 1444

PostPosted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 7:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Did I hear on the news that Harry was playing Dominos? Have they published the correct photos... where's the beers and the table... oh..and the dominos? The photos look more like some sort of knee trembling "upstairs" game to me but it's years since I've played dominos, perhaps like everything else the game has moved on a bit.

Oh! It's billiards... I see.....oh well.... there you go then...... easy mistake to make. Now it all makes sense.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ColinB
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 7:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I nearly spilled my coffee as I read those two words "knee trembling" Rachel! Razz
Back to top
mark occomore



Joined: 07 Dec 2006
Posts: 9955
Location: UK

PostPosted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 1:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm glad he's covering his crown jewels.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ruddlescat



Joined: 16 Sep 2010
Posts: 18010
Location: Near Chester

PostPosted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 7:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

mark occomore wrote:
I'm glad he's covering his crown jewels.


Well, perhaps they should be locked up in the Tower of London - now that would cramp his style quite a lot Smile
_________________
Are you ready for a Ruddles?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mark occomore



Joined: 07 Dec 2006
Posts: 9955
Location: UK

PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 5:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Sun Newspaper have decided to go with publishing the pictures. They say 'It's freedom of the press - what is the difference with them published on the internet and seen around the world, and can't be seen in a newspaper'!!... Those who complain are the ones who haven't got internet access. Some people do continue to think the Royals are blue blooded, but they are red blooded and human like everyone else. I think The Sun are right, but have rewritten the Leveson inquiry.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Toggy



Joined: 18 Aug 2008
Posts: 1239

PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 6:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Isn't it big of The Sun to publish the photos, pathetic newspaper.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ColinB
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 7:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

mark occomore wrote:
I think The Sun are right, but have rewritten the Leveson inquiry.


How can The Sun "re-write the Leveson Inquiry"?
Back to top
becky sharp



Joined: 01 Dec 2008
Posts: 5761

PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 7:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pick,pick,pick .... Rolling Eyes
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
iwarburton



Joined: 08 Dec 2006
Posts: 2133
Location: Northumberland

PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 4:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Sun claim that it's in the public interest for them to publish the pics and cite the need to discuss the shortcomings on the part of security officers that may have been a factor in this happening. Maybe the officers have some questions to answer but this could have been commented on without the pics being published. And, as for the low-life who sold them on......

Ian.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
unclebuck



Joined: 19 Apr 2010
Posts: 256
Location: Warwickshire

PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 4:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's hard to believe that there are some people who do not acknowledge that there is a right of privacy if someone is a member of the royal family.
I thought this argument was settled in a Paris underpass in 1997.

The Sun managing editor needs to lose his job immediately.
Very sad.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Helen May



Joined: 10 Dec 2006
Posts: 18089
Location: Cheshire

PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 4:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

iwarburton wrote:
The Sun claim that it's in the public interest for them to publish the pics and cite the need to discuss the shortcomings on the part of security officers that may have been a factor in this happening. Maybe the officers have some questions to answer but this could have been commented on without the pics being published. And, as for the low-life who sold them on......

Ian.


Exactly Ian and Uncle Buck. You don't need pictures to discuss the lack of minders and what they should have been doing at the time. It will be interesting to know if the circulation figures were increased by the pictures.

H
_________________
88 - 91 FM this is Radio 2 from the BBC!

I said it live on air in the studio with Jeremy Vine on 10/3/2005
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ColinB
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 5:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

unclebuck wrote:
The Sun managing editor needs to lose his job immediately.
Very sad.


The decision to publish the pics was taken much further up - Mr. Rupert "Don Corleone" Murdoch himself. Faced with being slammed by the Leveson Inquiry (whose report is to be published very soon) this is the Murdoch Mafia putting two fingers up to Leveson and the establishment.

If the people who actually paid for their copy of Sun today did so in increased numbers, then they must be pretty thick; the damage they're doing to all of us is potentially collossal.

I saw a car sticker the other day which read: "If you buy The Sun you're part of the problem". I like that!
Back to top
mark occomore



Joined: 07 Dec 2006
Posts: 9955
Location: UK

PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 7:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's not as if the pictures were a secret. Obviously all phones were fully charged and the Prince was three sheets to the wind. Great sting if you know who to contact. Guessing anymore parties he ever does have, will be phone or camera free.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mark occomore



Joined: 07 Dec 2006
Posts: 9955
Location: UK

PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 7:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Would a picture of Rupert Murdoch's private parts ...be in the public interest to see, upholding the freedom of the press, if published? Maybe Private Eye would dare publish them?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ruddlescat



Joined: 16 Sep 2010
Posts: 18010
Location: Near Chester

PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 10:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well you all know what I think of The Sun and the press generally - a load of ar--holes who would do virtually anything just so long as they get a 'good story'

The only good thing to come out of all this is that just maybe the rest of the press might end up being in dispute with The Sun and the Murdoch Empire generally so we might actually start to see other newspapers taking a more independent line on particular issues rather than blindly following the agenda set by Murdoch and his cronies Mad

I have to laugh at the current comments from various people connected with our wonderful British media to the effect that Leverson has effectively emasculated them from publishing anything intrusive on the private lives of individuals

You have to ask yourself 'why did we have the Leveson enquiry?
Oh yes now I remember - it was as a result of press intrusion into the personal lives of many high profile people often by unlawful means

I'm reminded of the saying 'you reap what you sow' and it 's never more true than in the case of the British press Smile
_________________
Are you ready for a Ruddles?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    R2OK! Forum Index -> News and Current Affairs All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group. Hosted by phpBB.BizHat.com