View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
mark occomore
Joined: 07 Dec 2006 Posts: 9955 Location: UK
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ruddlescat
Joined: 16 Sep 2010 Posts: 18010 Location: Near Chester
|
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Didn't realise they got involved in sexual offences on Operation Yewtree - when do they find the time - it's no wonder people are losing confidence in the police
On a more serious note what is it Mr Davidson used to say - something like Nick Nick - never realised he could forecast the future  _________________ Are you ready for a Ruddles? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
SantaFefan

Joined: 07 Dec 2006 Posts: 11258 Location: top of the cliffs in Norfolk
|
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | ....arrested by Jimmy Savile detectives |
Not really a laughing matter I suppose but I have this vision of baton waving "detectives" dressed as Jimmy Saville bursting into the room... "Now then, Now then..."  _________________ Johnnie Walker read out my message on Pirate Radio! 13/8/07
I have heard how radio should be. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
oldraver

Joined: 18 Dec 2006 Posts: 1175 Location: London
|
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 10:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
 _________________ life is what happens to you while you're busy making other plans |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mark occomore
Joined: 07 Dec 2006 Posts: 9955 Location: UK
|
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2013 8:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
"High profile names being picked from the 60s upto 90s from women going to the police after thinking - ' oh yes, I have a photo of so and so and they cuddled me, so lets go and speak to the police and make claims on abuse or assault" - Max Clifford was right ' celebrities from that era must be worried if they will get a knock at the door' I'm guessing- the police along with the CPS have to draw a line under this at some stage as a small percentage of claims will be from attention seekers trying to get money, a lot of these high profile cases will attract them' |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ruddlescat
Joined: 16 Sep 2010 Posts: 18010 Location: Near Chester
|
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2013 8:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mark occomore wrote: | "High profile names being picked from the 60s upto 90s from women going to the police after thinking - ' oh yes, I have a photo of so and so and they cuddled me, so lets go and speak to the police and make claims on abuse or assault" - Max Clifford was right ' celebrities from that era must be worried if they will get a knock at the door' I'm guessing- the police along with the CPS have to draw a line under this at some stage as a small percentage of claims will be from attention seekers trying to get money, a lot of these high profile cases will attract them' |
Spot On Mark  _________________ Are you ready for a Ruddles? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mark occomore
Joined: 07 Dec 2006 Posts: 9955 Location: UK
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
oldraver

Joined: 18 Dec 2006 Posts: 1175 Location: London
|
Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 11:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
I read that this morning, Mark. He's spot on. It's all a PR exercise. The serious offenders - the ones that were in cahoots with Mr Jingly Jangly, remain untouched, while this Keystone Cops business gets more laughable with every new "arrest", of someone who may have grabbed a pair of boobs, back in the days when On The Buses was the top comedy show. _________________ life is what happens to you while you're busy making other plans |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
childprufe
Joined: 22 Dec 2006 Posts: 212 Location: lincolnshire
|
Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 3:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
I saw a documentary last week about Freddie Mercury in which Paul Gambacinni said it was wrong to judge people of the past by today's (supposed) standards. How very true. _________________ Standing on Ray Moore's shoulders |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
John W

Joined: 07 Dec 2006 Posts: 3367 Location: Warwickshire, UK
|
Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 10:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
childprufe wrote: | I saw a documentary last week about Freddie Mercury in which Paul Gambacinni said it was wrong to judge people of the past by today's (supposed) standards. How very true. |
I saw Mike Read on TV a few weeks ago saying something similar, he was frightened of some witch hunt (that might snag him?) but if what occurred 30 years ago was illegal then, and still is now, then charges should be brought. _________________ -
John W |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ruddlescat
Joined: 16 Sep 2010 Posts: 18010 Location: Near Chester
|
Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 10:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's not quite a simple as that John from a legal point of view
The CPS has to decide by law whether any charges would be in the public interest and whether there is any realistic chance of securing a conviction before they bring charges against any individual
Clearly with the considerable length of time which has elapsed in these cases and the possible destruction of evidence or witnesses being dead it is by no means a straightforward task - my own view is that we should move on cognisant of historical wrongdoings - the most important thing is to put in place a system whereby such things can never happen in the future  _________________ Are you ready for a Ruddles? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
John W

Joined: 07 Dec 2006 Posts: 3367 Location: Warwickshire, UK
|
Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 10:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah I see that ruddles. When it's just one word against another a successful prosecution, with no forensic evidence, is unlikely, it becomes no case to answer unless witnesses come forward, and even then witnesses evidence from decades ago has to be considered carefully. _________________ -
John W |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|